As i expected, Trump wins

In my previous post about trump chances in winning, i expected that a lot of people would be lying to polls just to avoid being labeled as racists etc … And that in fact, Trump is much more popular than what appears in polls, and that was the case.

Maybe we need a new type of polling

I expected that a lot of Latino and African American voters would vote for Trump, and so they did!

The political pundits are still trying to frame this as a last minute decision, even-though most voters made up their mind before September.

Democrats thought they can play the gender card, after all the race card was successful for the last 2 terms, unfortunately for them it did not work well, because it appears it might have created a polarizing choice.
> if the wife is voting for her just because she is a woman, the husband might vote for him to cancel the wife’s vote,  more women voted for Hillary (not only because she is a women, but also because of supporting abortion, and because of the trump audio about grabbing private parts), but also more men voted for Trump (some can not handle being led by a woman, especially those men having women bosses and managers)
men-woman-vote

PS: I’m not a Republican nor a Democrat, heck, i’m not even American ..

The last of the real men !

I would like to classify this in the category of contrarian thinking, but in reality this is simply freethinking, basic logical analysis.

What differentiate a man from a woman, well, go to any gym and you’ll immediately spot the difference, the average woman is training with a 1 pound dumbbell, while the average guy is training with a 40 pound dumbbell.
Men are bigger, much stronger and with a hormone that makes them more aggressive and more assertive, all these qualities where the reason why the human history so far was mostly if not entirely written by men.

But things are changing, the feminist movement, which was born to give the women their rightful rights of equality, have with time morphed to become a freak that works hard to strip men from their manhood. Yes, it’s no longer about being equal in the eyes of society, now feminists are waging wars to denigrate men’s instinctive behaviors, lobbying for equal job opportunities in sectors where females under-perform, and downright trying to reshape the male ideal image towards  the image of a woman with a d#ck!
The new image of women, is that they should go out try few dozen men, the settle on a guy whom they can basically control.

Since when women wear the pants in the house ? In eastern society this is a laughable situation, in western society this is the norm!
Since when women should have so many sexual partners, and why the heck should men settle with these modern day wh@res!

Yes for equality as citizens, yes for equality as partners, but hell no for trying to pacify us! The feminists are pushing towards the extension of Alpha males, why ? Because these Alpha males are ridiculed, and accused of sexual harassment!
Let me give you a couple examples:

Cat calling: Defined as a whistle, shout, or a sexual move, is considered as sexual harassment, across the US the laws/punishment for street harassers falls into the hands of the state. In Illinois there are laws that relate to street harassment. Laws such as disorderly conduct, intimidation or soliciting a sexual act can be used in court if a report is filed. All good, till you realize that this is probably how your grandparents met, and your grand grand parents met, and so on to the beginning of early communities. So in theory if you see a beautiful girl walking and you tell her she’s beautiful hoping to be able to get to know her, you can end up in jail. But then we wonder why some guys have problems finding dates, or worse we rely on websites to find us life partners (don’t get me wrong, i run several dating site, i don’t want to spit on my food, but that’s not natural!).

Mansplaining: When a guy interrupts a girl, and tell her let me explain, well, there’s a reason why he interrupts, as you might have noticed many women can’t stop talking (some men too), the feminist love to use this term to ridicule men that exhibit some alpha male behavior.

Dear feminists, you want real equality ? earn it! push for no makeup and no breast plastic surgery. Ask for women to be chosen for jobs when they have no makeup and are in descent clothes. Yeah, don’t take men for fools, half the jobs women get are based entirely on their fake looks, you want real equality ask the women of not taking advantage of their sexual image to get things done!

Here’s the qualities of real men (funnily none of these are major qualities for women):
– A real man do not gossip
– A real man’s word is his bond
– A real man is the man of the house
– A real man can and is willing to defend himself and his family.

 

Is the BREXIT actually good for the EU ?

I have previously written numerous article concerning this subject, but none was really analyzing the long term effect, now i decided to do so.

London Capital of Europe

English is the world most influential language, and was for a long time the most widespread second language, whenever you group several people from different countries, the predominant language would be English, and that statement is even more true in Europe (unless the countries have a common language).
Long term, London was destined to becoming the Capital of Europe, simply because it’s the only place where you can group hundreds of bilingually diverse people, people with a common language and at the same time a distinct language allowing them to communicate with the world. As a result of that, it was destined to become the hub for all the multinational companies that wish to operate European wide.

Why the BREXIT is good for the EU

1- Multinationals: By exiting the EU, the UK kind of forced the big companies to move to continental Europe, and without a single heavy weight, like in the case of London, it is expected that companies will spread across several countries, that means there’s more jobs that are going to be created in many EU countries, and the multinationals will boost the economy of several countries not only one.

2- Banks Migration: The financial institutions are expected to move to continental Europe, thus the EU will have a better control of how the finance sector is operating, thus avoiding any perturbations.

3- The UK political weight:  The UK was not playing and never actually played team Europe, it was more aligned with the US politics. US politics and EU politics are not the same, and by exiting, the UK did undermine the US influence on the EU politics.

4- National Identities: The UK presence in the EU was basically pushing towards a unique language, because as mentioned previously “English” is a very important language. But with no UK in EU, more of the EU languages will be promoted.

5- Less unskilled migrants: Put aside the economic refugees, the biggest destination for unskilled migrants in Europe is the UK. Why ? simple, because half the earth populations speaks some level of english, and the UK economy is good. With no UK in the EU, it’s less tempting for young men to migrate from Afganistan, Pakistan, Africa … to a EU country where they will not be able to understand a single word.

trump-hillary

What are Trump chances ?

After watching the last 2 US presidential debates, i came to notice that Donald Trump is not the dumb guy portrayed by the media. In many points he makes sense …

It is visible though that Hillary is way more prepared and experienced, due mainly to her 30 year presence in one way or another on the political scene. This is not necessarily a good thing for electors, as they might associate her with previous politics failure.
Another point is interesting from a political point of view, is that Trump is a bit naive when it comes to the US foreign policy, even though he does quote wikileaks often, it seams that he do not give the same importance to all the revelations, which also include the US involvement in changing and shaping regions to it’s liking , i would recommend reading or watching “the confessions of an economic hitman”

But back to the question, What are Trump chances in Winning the US Elections ?

I would describe them as high, for the following reasons:

1- Hillary does not appear trustworthy, as a neutral observer, it stroke me several times that she is manipulative. Don’t get me wrong, Trump also appears lying, but the difference is that he does not appear manipulative, but simply lying to save face.

2- The media have demonized Trump so much, that it’s not possible to identify his supporters anymore, the supporters did not abandon him, but they are just pretending something else. They might tell you they want to vote for Hillary or Sanders (eventhough he’s not on ballots anymore) or charlie brown etc…, but at the end of the day, they will vote for their candidate. So, no way to trust the Polls, the margin of error is HUGE (sorry couldn’t resist).

3- He is definitely getting all the votes of people fed up with illegal immigration, and that include: many African American, many American Latinos.

4- He has the bible belt support, and don’t be surprised if your local church is telling you to go vote for Trump just before election day.

 

So yeah, Trump chances are still pretty high, need to wait and see.

 

Why did Britain choose to Brexit

In case you have no idea yet why would the UK decide to leave the EU,

Here’s a couple good examples (videos below) at what is happening at the French / UK borders.

This is happening inside a EU state, these are not desperate people trying to cross the border from a war torn country.

2 Weeks ago, 3 journalists from the mail almost died when their car crashed due to one of these illegal immigrants throwing a branch of tree on their car, see the last video below.

How can this be even acceptable ?

For F”ck sake, i am an immigrant as well , i immigrated to Europe 12 years ago, on a college scholarship, and after having a small startup and meeting a nice girl, i stayed. Most of my study friends that came with me, left back to home …. Yes we are immigrants, but those are opportunist – which all are illegal immigrants by the way –  operating in a mob mentality, hoping to game the system. They have close to no skills and they are not even smart enough to game the system on their own, they tell one another how to do it.

 

Freethinker VS Contrarian thinker

I have labeled myself a freethinker since many many years, to be honest, i was born a freethinker, and did not really coexist peacefully with rules and general opinions. But as i got older and hopefully wiser, i started noticing that being a freethinker is not enough, being a contrarian thinker fit me even better.

But really what is the difference and what are the similarities?

Let’s take the definition of a freethinker: A free thinker is defined as a person who forms his or her own opinions about important subjects (such as religion and politics) instead of accepting what others say. Freethinkers are heavily committed to the use of scientific inquiry, and logic.

The definition of contrarian thinker is: A contrarian is a person who takes up a contrary position, especially a position that is opposed to that of the majority, regardless of how unpopular it may be.

So to be a contrarian thinker, you’ll need to be a freethinker, but that’s not enough, you’ll need to have the courage to say out loud your opinions, regardless of how unpopular they are.

To understand this you’ll need to visualize yourself within a group of people defending an idea, that most find unacceptable.

For example, the champion of contrarian thinking, and my personal hero, is Peter Thiel, this guy is really unpopular these days, especially after expressing his interest in young blood transfusion

But as a contrarian thinker true to his nature, he is going after what many consider a taboo, but at the same time, if this science works, it would be a great scientific achievement.

There are so many practical solutions to world problems that are not considered, due to political correctness, human emotions, etc … Contrarian thinkers need to start knocking and showing the way, maybe the world would be reasonable again.

 

Game of Thrones : The Andal Invasion

I’m a big Game of Thrones fan, team John Snow …

As any respectable GOT fan, i was curious and researched a bit the history of westeros…
I came across the event called “The Andal Invasion”.

Here’s a small video that explains it in a simple way:

While i was reading the article in the Game of thrones wiki, i came across this passage:

Given that author George R.R. Martin has said that the story loosely parallels the War of the Roses in fifteenth century Britain, the Andal Invasion is loosely comparable to the Anglo-Saxon invasion of Britain. Just as the First Men were able to stop the Andals from expanding to the North in Westeros, the Celtic people living in Scotland were able to repulse Anglo-Saxon expansion from the south. However, the real-life Anglo-Saxon invaders followed a polytheistic religion and destroyed the Christianized Romano-British society that existed in Britain up to that time. In an inversion, the Andal Invasion introduced the pseudo-Catholic Christian “Faith of the Seven” which supplanted the polytheistic, nature-worshiping religion of the Old Gods.

I have reasons to believe that the Andal Invasion is comparable to an entirely other invasion, so let’s start examining my points:

The Andals were a tall, fair-haired race whose original homeland was located across the Narrow Sea on the western coast of the continent of Essos, in a region known as Andalos.

First, Andalos sounded very familiar to my ear, and for a reason Andalus is considered the peak of the Islamic expansion, Andalus is the name given by the Muslim invaders to the territory they controlled in modern day Spain.

Then there’s 3 small points that poked my curiosity:
– Andals were a tall fair haired race, thus a different phenotype from the 1st men.
– The Narrow Sea, thus there was a sea separating the 2, and the invasion happened from the narrow part.
– Westeros sounds a lot like “West” Essos like “East”
Arabs were the opposite to the above phenotype description, and the Muslim invasion happened from the narrow sea between Morocco and Spain. It seams that GRR Martin just flipped the image. It’s not that surprising from someone who names a dragon : drogon !!

then there’s this part:

According to Andal legend, the God of Seven revealed itself to them in the Hills of Andalos, and from this they developed a new religion, the Faith of the Seven. Not long afterward, spurred on by the zeal of their new faith, the Andals set sail across the Narrow Sea to conquer Westeros.

Andal God revealed himself in the hills, a bit similar to the Islamic first revelation that took place in a cave on a hill near Mecca.

The Andals developed a new religion that rapidly expanded, spurred by the zeal of the new faith. Again, Islam is the only religion that after it was developed rapidly expanded, spurred by the zeal of the believers. And another point, Islam expansion, is the only conquest that was really motivated by religion.

So here we go, i think the Andal invasion loosely parallels the Islamic invasion rather than the Anglo-Saxon one.